Recently, Kemi Badenoch, the UK Secretary of State for Business and Trade, made controversial remarks questioning the feasibility of achieving net zero emissions by 2050. It has unsurprisingly created quite the debate since.

According to Ms Badenoch, the ambitious climate target is "impossible" to reach in its current form, primarily due to its perceived economic and technological challenges. In her words, “we have to be honest about what the country can achieve, and it is impossible to meet these targets at the speed that they are being set.”

While these comments have sparked considerable debate, it is crucial to approach them with a critical eye, especially given the long-term implications they may have on public perception and global sustainability efforts.

The Challenge of Net Zero: Real or Imagined?

Net zero refers to the balance between the amount of greenhouse gases emitted and the amount removed from the atmosphere. Achieving this balance by 2050 is a cornerstone of international climate policy, endorsed by governments, scientists, and businesses alike. However, some argue that the scale of transformation required in sectors such as energy, transport, and agriculture make this goal impractical.

Badenoch’s remarks draw attention to real challenges in transitioning away from fossil fuels and decarbonising industries that are deeply ingrained in modern economies. She highlighted the difficulty of achieving net zero “without creating severe economic consequences” and emphasised the need for a balanced approach that does not harm people's livelihoods.

While these concerns are valid, they overlook the potential for innovation and the progress already made. Sir David Attenborough, renowned naturalist and environmental campaigner, has stated, “The truth is, the sooner we act, the better. Climate change is real, it is happening now, and it will get worse if we do nothing.” This sense of urgency cannot be overstated. The path to net zero is undoubtedly challenging, but it is also an opportunity to reshape industries and economies in a sustainable and resilient way.

The Risk of Undermining Progress

The challenge of net zero is not whether it is technically or economically feasible, but whether we are willing to meet the challenge head-on. Discrediting the goal of net zero could have a detrimental impact on the momentum already built around climate action. Governments, businesses, and individuals have already committed vast resources to the transition, and any suggestion that the goal is unattainable could reduce investor confidence, dissuade future innovations, and undermine public trust in long-term policy solutions.

The UK has made considerable progress in reducing emissions and investing in renewable energy. Between 1990 and 2019, we reduced our carbon emissions by 43%, a success largely driven by renewable energy generation and energy efficiency measures. As Greg Jackson, CEO of Octopus Energy, has noted, “The switch to clean energy is inevitable. The economics are clear—renewables are cheaper than fossil fuels, and we are already seeing the shift.”

While the next steps will be more challenging, these achievements indicate that we are on the right path, even if the road is steep. The future of energy generation, transportation, and agriculture can and will be low-carbon - it’s just a matter of pushing for more transformative change. The speed of this, however, is still being questioned.

The Real "Impossibility" Lies in Inaction

Perhaps the most dangerous consequence of Badenoch’s remarks is the risk of promoting inaction or complacency. Climate change is an existential threat, and without concrete targets like net zero, we risk losing the political and social momentum needed to implement policies that will mitigate its effects. The overwhelming consensus from scientists and environmental experts is clear: we must reduce emissions and accelerate the transition to a sustainable future, or face increasingly severe consequences.

If the narrative shifts toward impossibility, it could embolden climate change sceptics, halt essential policies, and disrupt the commitment of businesses already investing in green technologies. Moreover, it risks leaving behind the global majority - those countries and communities most vulnerable to climate change - who have already embraced sustainability goals in hopes of safeguarding their futures.

Christiana Figueres, former UN Climate Change Executive Secretary and one of the architects of the Paris Agreement, argues, “The climate crisis is a crisis of ambition. We have the technology, we have the solutions, and we know what we need to do. The question is: will we do it?” Her statement encapsulates the importance of maintaining optimism and collective action, even in the face of significant obstacles.

The Path Forward: Balancing Realism with Optimism

Instead of viewing net zero as an unattainable target, we must frame it as a necessary and achievable ambition - albeit one that will require innovation, flexibility, and a willingness to adapt. Achieving net zero is not about having all the solutions today, but about creating the conditions for solutions to emerge and evolve. There are numerous technologies, such as green hydrogen and carbon capture, that are still in their infancy but could become game-changers in the coming decades.

Furthermore, the transition to net zero offers opportunities for new industries, job creation, and economic resilience. With the right investment in research, development, and upskilling, countries can position themselves as global leaders in green technologies, enhancing both economic prosperity and environmental stewardship.

As former-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak himself acknowledged, “The UK has already led the world in reducing carbon emissions by more than any other major economy… we are committed to leading the way to net zero while ensuring that we protect jobs, livelihoods, and our economy.”

Why Net Zero Matters

In a time when the impacts of climate change are becoming increasingly visible, the “impossibility” of achieving net zero must not become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Rather, it is crucial to recognise that we have the tools, knowledge, and resources to shift towards a sustainable future. The transition may be difficult, but the alternative - inaction and worsening climate crisis - carries far higher costs for people, economies, and the planet.

Badenoch’s comments, while drawing attention to real challenges, risk misguiding the public and undermining the collective momentum required to tackle one of humanity's most pressing crises. We must reject the narrative of impossibility and embrace the work that lies ahead, ensuring a liveable future for generations to come.

Follow us on LinkedIn

Read more of our blogs

Take a look at our policy, public affairs, strategic comms and economist jobs